In metal ore processing, the right jaw crusher feed size isn’t just a technical detail—it’s a critical lever for efficiency, cost control, and long-term production stability. Whether you're handling hard iron ore or copper-bearing rock, mismatched feed sizes can lead to excessive wear, inconsistent output, and unplanned downtime.
Our analysis of over 40 real-world installations shows that feeding material in the 0–1020mm range significantly impacts performance:
| Feed Size Range (mm) | Crushing Efficiency (%) | Wear Rate Increase | Output Uniformity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–500 | 88–92% | Low (baseline) | High |
| 501–750 | 90–94% | Moderate (+15%) | Good |
| 751–1020 | 82–86% | High (+35%) | Variable |
A mining operation in Mpumalanga reduced liner replacement frequency by 40% after switching from uncontrolled 1200mm feed to a controlled 600mm maximum. Their jaw crusher now runs at 91% efficiency with consistent 30–50mm product size—ideal for downstream grinding.
In Antofagasta, a copper concentrator achieved a 22% reduction in energy consumption per tonne processed by optimizing feed size to 450–600mm using pre-screening. The key? Matching crusher capacity to the ore’s hardness index (typically 5–7 on Mohs scale).
Still unsure how to match your feed size? Let us help you avoid costly mistakes—our engineers have helped over 200 global clients optimize their jaw crushers based on real-time mine conditions.
Got questions about jaw crusher selection for your specific ore type? Share your challenges below—we reply within 24 hours.
Get Your Customized Jaw Crusher Solution Now
.jpg?x-oss-process=image/resize,m_fill,h_800,w_800/format,webp)
Facebook