Case Study: Energy-Efficient Crushing of Metal Ores Abroad Using PE Jaw Crusher and Impact Crusher Integration

MiningAlliance
2025-11-11
Customer Cases
In overseas metal ore processing projects, how can energy consumption be reduced through optimized configuration of PE jaw crushers and impact crushers? This case study revisits a real-world copper mine project in Africa, detailing the graded crushing process for feed sizes ranging from 0–1020mm. It covers collaborative coarse-to-medium crushing logic, screening integration techniques, dust control measures, and modular deployment strategies—delivering a proven framework to build efficient, stable, and environmentally friendly crushing systems that boost recovery rates while minimizing unit energy costs. The insights are applicable across global mining operations seeking sustainable and high-performance solutions.
https://shmuker.oss-accelerate.aliyuncs.com/data/oss/66cfd7603dfc4b7004f304ac/66d56c26c70a712e82152eb9/20240909140632/HGT-Gyratory-Crusher-2.jpg

How We Cut Energy Costs in a Real African Copper Mine — A PE Jaw Crusher + Impact Crusher Case Study

In the competitive world of global mining operations, reducing energy consumption while maintaining throughput is no longer optional—it’s essential. Our recent work on a copper mine project in Zambia shows how smart integration of PE jaw crushers and impact crushers can slash unit energy costs by up to 22%, improve product consistency, and meet strict environmental standards—all without compromising production volume.

The Challenge: From 0–1020mm Feed to High-Quality Crushed Ore

At this African site, raw ore entered the plant with inconsistent sizes—some pieces over 1 meter long. Without proper pre-screening and staged crushing, the downstream processing suffered from frequent blockages, high wear rates, and excessive power draw. Initial tests showed that using only a single-stage crusher led to a 35% higher kWh/ton compared to optimized multi-stage setups.

Crushing Stage Avg. Input Size (mm) Energy Use per Ton (kWh) Key Outcome
Single-stage jaw 0–1020 18.7 High vibration, low efficiency
PE Jaw + Impact Crusher 0–300 → 300–1020 14.5 Stable output, reduced dust, lower maintenance

Why This Setup Works Better

By splitting the process into two stages—coarse crushing with a PE jaw crusher followed by medium crushing with an impact breaker—we achieved:

  • A 22% drop in specific energy consumption (from 18.7 to 14.5 kWh/ton)
  • Improved particle shape (reducing fines generation by 18%)
  • Better control over dust emissions via integrated screening between stages
  • Easier maintenance due to modular design and clear workflow separation
Pro Tip: For optimal performance, set your vibrating feeder at 12–15 Hz for feed rate control when handling variable-sized material. Too fast = overloaded crusher; too slow = idle time and lost productivity.

We’ve served over 137 countries in mining, and this exact configuration has been successfully deployed in projects across South America, Southeast Asia, and Africa—with consistent results in both small-scale operations and large industrial plants.

What makes our approach different? It’s not just about selling equipment—it’s about delivering a proven, replicable system tailored to real-world conditions. Whether you're planning a new mine or optimizing an existing one, understanding how each piece interacts matters more than any single machine.

Ready to reduce your energy costs and boost recovery rates?

Get Your Free Crusher Process Optimization Checklist
Name *
Email *
Message*

Recommended Products

Contact us
Crushing machinery, please contact us for details
[email protected]
https://shmuker.oss-cn-hangzhou.aliyuncs.com/tmp/temporary/60ec5bd7f8d5a86c84ef79f2/60ec5bdcf8d5a86c84ef7a9a/thumb-prev.png